Skip Navigation

Are Underground Markets Really More Violent? Evidence from Early 20th Century America

  1. Emily Greene Owens
  1. Cornell University
  1. Send correspondence to: Emily Greene Owens, Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Tel: 607-255-2069; Fax: 607-255-4071; E-mail: ego5{at}cornell.edu.

Abstract

The violent nature of illegal markets is one rationale for legalizing the sale of narcotics. High U.S. crime rates during the 1920s are regularly presented as evidence of the strong positive relationship between market illegality and violence. The author tests this theory by exploiting state-level variation in homicides and in the passage and repeal of temperance laws before and after Federal Prohibition. Support for the “wet” cause was positively associated with homicides in dry states. However, on average, murder rates did not increase when alcohol markets were criminalized. Observed crime trends during the early 20th century are primarily explained by demographic changes.

JEL

JEL codes

| Table of Contents

Impact Factor: 0.594

5-Yr impact factor: 0.829

Editors-in-Chief

Max Schanzenbach

Northwestern University School of Law

Abraham Wickelgren

University of Texas at Austin

For Authors

Oxford Open RCUK

Looking for your next opportunity?

Looking for jobs...

Widget

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.