American Law and Economics Review Advance Access published online on December 5, 2006
American Law and Economics Review, doi:10.1093/aler/ahl015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 University of Connecticut
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The responsibility for uncovering discrimination falls on both scholars and civil rights enforcement officials. Scholars ask whether discrimination exists and why it arises; enforcement officials ask whether particular firms are discriminating. This article investigates the points of commonality and divergence in these two lines of inquiry. We demonstrate a need for more research focusing on discrimination as defined by the law and for more enforcement building on the methodological lessons in the research literature. We also show that disparate-impact discrimination cannot be identified with current enforcement tools but could be identified with methods in the scholarly literature.
Article
Uncovering Discrimination: A Comparison of the Methods Used by Scholars and Civil Rights Enforcement Officials
Stephen L. Ross 1 and John Yinger 2 *
2 Maxwell School, Syracuse University
John Yinger, E-mail: jyinger{at}maxwell.syr.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Yinger Municipal Bond Ratings and Citizens' Rights Am. Law Econ. Rev., October 20, 2009; (2009) ahp013v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
