Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parisi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Fon, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow K13 - Tort Law and Product Liability
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Law and Economics Review V6 N2 2004 (345-368)
American Law and Economics Review Vol. 6 No. 2, © American Law and Economics Association 2004; all rights reserved.

Comparative Causation

Francesco Parisi

George Mason University

Vincy Fon

George Washington University

Send correspondence to: Francesco Parisi, George Mason University, School of Law, Arlington, VA 22201; Fax: (703) 993-8088; E-mail: parisi{at}gmu.edu.

This article examines the criterion of comparative causation according to which an accident loss is apportioned between a faultless tortfeasor and an innocent victim on the basis of their relative causal contributions to the loss. To explain the rule's structural features, we consider a scenario where liability is allocated on the basis of causation, regardless of fault. While this model brings to light several interesting features, it also unveils the limits of such a criterion with respect to induced activity and care levels. Next we extend the model to consider the comparative causation rule in conjunction with negligence rules. Applying the comparative causation rule under a negligence regime induces a combination of incentives that is not provided by any known liability rule.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Econ OrganHome page
E. Feess, G. Muehlheusser, and A. Wohlschlegel
Screening in Courts: On the Joint Use of Negligence and Causation Standards
J. Law Econ. Organ., September 5, 2009; (2009) ewp027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Econ OrganHome page
G. Dari-Mattiacci and N. Garoupa
Least-Cost Avoidance: The Tragedy of Common Safety
J. Law Econ. Organ., May 1, 2009; 25(1): 235 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Law Econ RevHome page
A. M. Feldman and R. Singh
Comparative Vigilance
Am. Law Econ. Rev., March 5, 2009; (2009) ahp001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.