Skip Navigation


American Law and Economics Review Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2009
American Law and Economics Review 2009 11(1):79-111; doi:10.1093/aler/ahp005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/79    most recent
ahp005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masten, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
Right arrow L91 - Transportation: General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Long-Term Contracts and Short-Term Commitment: Price Determination for Heterogeneous Freight Transactions

Scott E. Masten

University of Michigan

Send Correspondence to: Scott E. Masten, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, USA; Tel.: (734) 764-1389; Fax: (815) 572-8207; E-mail: semasten{at}umich.edu

JEL Classification: D86, L14, L91


   Abstract

This paper considers a class of contracts in which parties write detailed, long-term performance obligations that leave one or both parties with broad discretion to terminate the agreement on short notice with little or no penalty. I argue that formal contracts may be valuable, even where trade involves little or no relationship-specific investment and termination is the only remedy, as a way of economizing on the cost of determining prices for a series of heterogeneous transactions. Evidence from a survey of truck drivers shows both the general structure of contracts between freight carriers and drivers and the manner in which hauls are priced to be consistent with the goal of economizing on renegotiation costs.


Portions of this paper were previously circulated in Lafontaine and Masten (2002). I wish to thank Kenneth Boyer, Joseph Mahoney, and participants at seminars at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Tilburg University Law and Economics Center for valuable comments. The analysis and results, as well as any errors therein, are the responsibility of the author. Financial support from the Sloan Foundation through the University of Michigan Trucking Industry Program (UMTIP) is gratefully acknowledged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.