Skip Navigation


American Law and Economics Review Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2007
American Law and Economics Review 2007 9(1):30-47; doi:10.1093/aler/ahm008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/1/30    most recent
ahm008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medema, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B12 - Classical
Right arrow B31 - Individuals
Right arrow K00 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association.

Sidgwick's Utilitarian Analysis of Law: A Bridge from Bentham to Becker?

Steven G. Medema

Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Denver

Send correspondence to: Steven G. Medema Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Denver, Campus Box 181, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA.; E-mail: steven.medema{at}cudenver.edu


  Abstract

Jeremy Bentham's utilitarian analysis of crime and punishment is regularly characterized as an inspiration for the economic analysis of law, whereas Henry Sidgwick has been all but ignored in the discussions of the history of law and economics. Sidgwick is well known as the godfather of Cambridge welfare economics. Yet, as we will show, his utilitarian analysis of issues in property, contract, tort, and, criminal law reflects themes now associated with the Chicago approach and advances on Bentham in multiple ways—including through the use of marginal analysis—making him a bridge on the road from Bentham to Becker.

The author thanks Richard Posner, Alain Marciano, and workshop participants at the University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne for instructive comments on an earlier draft of the article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.