Legal Regime and Contractual Flexibility: A Comparison of Business’s Organizational Choices in France and the United States during the Era of Industrialization
University of California, Los Angeles and NBER
University of California, Los Angeles
Send correspondence to: Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Department of Economics, 8283 Bunche Hall, 405 Hilgard Avenue, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1477; E-mail: lamoreaux{at}econ.ucla.edu.
We compare the law governing business organizational forms in France and the United States during the nineteenth century and find that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, the contracting environment in the U.S. was neither freer nor more flexible than in France. U.S. businesses had a more limited menu of organizational choices and also much less ability to adapt the basic forms to meet their needs. Moreover, American law did not evolve any more readily in response to economic change than French law. In both nations, major changes in the rules governing organizational forms required the passage of new statutes.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Dixit Evaluating Recipes for Development Success World Bank Res. Obs., September 1, 2007; 22(2): 131 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Guinnane, R. Harris, N. R. Lamoreaux, and J.-L. Rosenthal Putting the Corporation in its Place Enterprise Soc., September 1, 2007; 8(3): 687 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Hannah Pioneering Modern Corporate Governance: A View from London in 1900 Enterprise Soc., September 1, 2007; 8(3): 642 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|