Skip Navigation

American Law and Economics Review 2005 7(1):1-27; doi:10.1093/aler/ahi005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klerman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahoney, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
Right arrow K40 - General
Right arrow N23 - Europe: Pre-1913
Right arrow N43 - Europe: Pre-1913
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The Value of Judicial Independence: Evidence from Eighteenth Century England

Daniel M. Klerman

University of Southern California Law School

Paul G. Mahoney

University of Virginia School of Law

Send correspondence to: Paul G. Mahoney, University of Virginia School of Law, 580 Massie Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903; E-mail: pmahoney{at}virginia.edu.

This article assesses the impact of changes in judicial independence on equity markets. North and Weingast (1989) argue that judicial independence and other institutional changes inaugurated by the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 improved public and private finance in England by putting restraints on the government. We calculate abnormal equity returns at critical points in the passage of statutes giving judges greater security of tenure and higher salaries. Early-eighteenth-century legislation granting tenure during good behavior is associated with large and statistically significant positive abnormal returns. Other statutes had positive but generally insignificant effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.