Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhagat, S.
Right arrow Articles by Romano, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Right arrow K22 - Corporation and Securities Law
Right arrow K41 - Litigation Process
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Law and Economics Review V4 N2 2002 (380-423)
© 2002 American Law and Economics Association

Event Studies and the Law: Part II: Empirical Studies of Corporate Law

Sanjai Bhagat and Roberta Romano

Sanjai Bhagat, University of Colorado at Boulder, and Roberta Romano, Yale University and National Bureau of Economic Research

Send correspondence to: Sanjai Bhagat, Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0419; E-mail: sanjai.bhagat{at}colorado.edu.

Abstract

This article is the second part of a review of the event study methodology, which has proved to be one of the most successful uses of econometrics in policy analysis. In this part we focus on the methodology's application to corporate law and corporate governance issues. Event studies have played an important role in the making of corporate law and in corporate law scholarship. The reason for this input is twofold. First, there is a match between the methodology and subject matter: the goal of corporate law is to increase shareholder wealth, and event studies provide a metric for measurement of the impact upon stock prices of policy decisions. Second, because the participants in corporate law debates share the objective of corporate law, to adopt policies that enhance shareholder wealth, their disagreements are over the means to achieve that end. Hence, the discourse can be empirically informed. The article concludes by sketching the methodology's use in evaluating the economic effects of regulation. While event studies' usefulness for policy analysis is by now familiar in the corporate law setting, we hope that our two-part review will suggest appropriate applications to other fields of law.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
J. Ang and C. Boyer
Finance and politics: the wealth effects of special interest group influence during the nationalisation and privatisation of Conrail
Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2007; 31(2): 193 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.