Skip Navigation


American Law and Economics Review Advance Access originally published online on December 26, 2008
American Law and Economics Review 2009 11(1):209-248; doi:10.1093/aler/ahn016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/209    most recent
ahn016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hjalmarsson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
Right arrow D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Crime and Expected Punishment: Changes in Perceptions at the Age of Criminal Majority

Randi Hjalmarsson

University of Maryland

Send correspondence to: Randi Hjalmarsson, University of Maryland, School of Public Policy, 4131 Van Munching Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA; E-mail: rhjalmar{at}umd.edu.

JEL Classification: D01, K42


   Abstract

This paper assesses whether perceived punishment severity changes discontinuously when an individual becomes an adult in the eyes of the courts. I find that the perceived chance of jail increases by 5.2 percentage points at the age of criminal majority, which is over and above the general effect of aging. The magnitude of this subjective change in the chance of jail at the age of majority appears to be substantially smaller than that found in objective data. Finally, a reduced-form analysis of whether self-reported criminal behavior changes discontinuously at the age of criminal majority finds little consistent evidence of deterrence.


I would like to thank John Donohue, Bill Evans, Erik Hjalmarsson, Jens Ludwig, Justin McCrary, Daniel Nagin, Peter Reuter, Stephen Ross, and Seth Sanders as well as two anonymous referees and seminar participants at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Department of Economics at Stockholm University, the 2007 Crime and Population Dynamics Summer Workshop, the 2007 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2007 ASC meetings, 2007 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society, 2007 European Economic Association meetings, and 2007 APPAM meetings for helpful feedback. This research was conducted with restricted access to Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the BLS. Any remaining errors are my own.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.