Skip Navigation


American Law and Economics Review Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2008
American Law and Economics Review 2008 10(2):424-453; doi:10.1093/aler/ahn015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/2/424    most recent
ahn015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perri, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Economics of US Civil War Conscription

Timothy J. Perri

Appalachian State University

Send correspondence to: Timothy J. Perri, Appalachian State University, Raley Hall, Room 3092, Boone, NC 28608, US; E-mail: perritj{at}appstate.edu.

JEL Classification: N11, N41, J45


   Abstract

US conscription in the Civil War is analyzed. Conscription was designed to gain federal control of enlistments, leaving state and local governments much of the fiscal and administrative responsibility for raising troops. Due to the hiring of substitutes, the payment of a fee to avoid service (commutation), and community-provided funds, only 2% of those who served were conscripted. Theory suggests that federal pay and local government bonuses increase as the marginal opposition by citizens to the number of reluctant draftees increases, and commutation could have lowered social cost. Instead, commutation was a binding ceiling on the price of substitutes.


I thank an anonymous referee, Steven Shavell (the editor), Fred Wallace, Don Parsons, and seminar participants at Appalachian State University, including Judkin Browning, Todd Cherry, and Jari Eloranta, for their comments on previous drafts of this paper.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.